Wednesday January 08, 2003
|
Vanity Foul Dedicated to the wanderings of an egotistical mind. |
|
More Free Roller goodness Kalixia is now offering free Roller hosting. But the owner is going to be moving soon, and the server won't be available for 2-3 weeks ... well, it'd be nice if someone could take some of the load off of Anthony's FreeRoller. Anthony, have you considered cleaning out some of the deadwood? There must be a number of sites that have gone stale (more than 2 months old) or have languished with the standard "this is your first post" post. ( Jan 08 2003, 02:05:32 PM ) Roller Permalink [Trackback] Roller supports Chinese? Supporting non-Western character-sets always seems near impossible (well, a lot of work), so imagine my surprise to find a FreeRoller site in chinese (okay, I'm guessing by some of the links, I wouldn't know chinese if it bit my ass). ( Jan 04 2003, 03:19:20 PM ) Roller Permalink [Trackback] More Havoc Jeff calls a spade a spade, quite rightly so. However, I think Fred (and I do not know him personally or even virtually) has dropped the idea of getting money upfront from potential customers. He is now talking about getting an investor (read a recent post to see more). And (again, my perception) I think Fred is targetting non-technical people who wouldn't know MT from the sharp end of a stick as his customers. But Jeff is quite right to point out "hey, we don't know this guy's qualifications!" and to raise QoS issues and such:
I'll support Fred for two reasons: Support FreeRoller: Anthony, you should post some numbers on how many donations you've received. I somehow doubt its enough to cover bandwidth. My thanks to those of you who have donated. ( Dec 31 2002, 04:27:32 PM ) Roller Permalink [Trackback] Cry Havoc and Release the Dogs of War! Anthony has thrown down the gauntlet for Fred. But I think Anthony misunderstands: it's not so much a shot at FreeRoller as Fred exploring ways to support himself without an employer ;-) (which I champion, would like to do the same myself). That said, someone should really offer to help out Anthony. Guess I could do it since I know how to, but it seems to me that someone who benefits from FreeRoller directly (like one of its users) should volunteer: you'd think one of the 348 people on FreeRoller would step forward. It's so easy to point elsewhere ;-( ( Dec 31 2002, 04:26:17 PM ) Roller Permalink [Trackback] [Link] UnFree Roller Fred has got plans to start a subscriber-supported Roller-based weblogging service. It's a good idea, there is some competition (that means it pays for someone). And since FreeRoller has this decidely Java-developer bent to it (quite unintended I am sure) there is little competition there ("Why should I pay to use Roller when I can go to FreeRoller?"). Good luck Fred! disclaimer: Fred has suggested that he will use proceeds to "hire" developers to work on Roller fixes and features - Dave, Matt & myself are the immediate prospects Soda + laptop = Death At some point yesterday my 4 year old spilled a glass of soda on my laptop. Now it won't boot. The top was down (so far as we know) so I don't think there was much "penetration" of soda into the case, but we really don't know. My wife was away (at a funeral) and Grandpa was watching the kids. They must have cleaned the exterior because when my wife came home there was no clue anything happened. But when she went to check her email, the WinXP boot screen came up and then it went black! Should I start one of those web-begging sites, seeking donations for a replacement? Nah, I still have *some* dignity. Oh my laptop, so young, taken from us before your time. ( Dec 31 2002, 08:08:47 AM ) Humor? Permalink [Trackback] [Link] Don't starve your anchors I know Vanity Foul is guilty of anorexic anchors, and seeing as it's a Roller template (borrowed from elsewhere) it's likely endemic (not to mention epidemic) to Roller. This is sort of a note to myself to correct this in the templates Roller "ships" with (and my own of course). later: and more semantic goodness... should we find a way to encourage this markup (which i just failed to obey) ? If we want a semantic web (I'm still unsold) then this looks like a good way to do it. More information is always good, unless it interferes with bandwidth, right? ( Dec 30 2002, 10:42:32 AM ) Roller Permalink [Trackback] [Link] |
|
||||